This should in fact not an issue with this structure; Sir John de- Keith d

This should in fact not an issue with this structure; Sir John de- Keith d

Re: ? Comyn spouse out-of Malise

In regards to the Comyn child who had been partner away from Malise from Strathearn, I got theorized from inside the 2005 you to definitely she were Margaret, defined as partner of Sir John de Keith (select backup away from blog post less than) who had been 2ndly age are supplied in that blog post: the wife Emma I would suggest are of some other relatives, rather than mommy of your own 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sandwich _Comyn, Earl away from Buchan_ , says in part, ‘Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn, had a partner Emma, in the 1261-1267, whose surname was unknown ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. off Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a bit prior to 1270, with the intention that his widow (Margaret) would-have-been “available” a bit after Emma.

This is needless to say a conjecture; it will feel the benefit of dealing with a known matchmaking anywhere between Muriel Keith and Reginald ce Cheyne. Any more associated files create naturally feel acceptance.

The new account inside Scots Peerage concerning the group of Keith states from Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) he are thought to has actually married Comyn, earl from Buchan . So it identity, of your own uncertain (“believed to was in fact”) diversity, may now end up being remedied in line with the after the dispensation, old within Fondi for the fourteen The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Towards bishop off Moray. Faculty to help you dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you can Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, from Moray and Aberdeen dioceses, from the obstacle so you can relationship due to the next and last degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the long term 2nd wife out-of Robert Stewart, first Duke off Albany (d. 1420), was contracted in order to get married Reginald ce Cheyne, son away from Sir Reginald le Cheyne from the his wife (once the their unique earliest spouse), Helen from Strathearn. Whenever you are discover renowned holes about origins off Muriel Keith, she and you may Reginald ce Cheyne manage express a lineage on Comyns. But not, this will be also distant to require a good dispensation if Muriel try an excellent-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl out of Buchan (d. 1233), that would function as the instance in the event the is the reason daughter.

2. Reginald le Cheyne is a-grandson of Marjory Comyn, child regarding Alexander Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1290), son of William Comyn in the list above. Their child is actually Malise, Earl regarding Strathearn off 1312 to help you his demise within the 1328 , and you will dad of Reginald.

ca. 1270), are just like Marjory Comyn, and you may married 2ndly to help you Malise, Earl of Strathearn (d. 1312). This should suggest the latest parentage a€?considered keeps been’ that Margaret, partner from Sir John de- Keith, is regarding one to generation: she’d not have become the latest d Comyn, Earl out of Buchan, but instead from their child Alexander. There is absolutely no research one Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn was in fact married much prior to 1275: while the Lindsay blogged,

You will find you to discernable foundation on which the connection ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you can Muriel Keith would have ourtime krediter existed: in the event that Margaret Comyn, partner away from Sir John de Keith (d

‘ The fresh wife in the earl, in the 1275, was entitled Marjory, while we understand the attesting condition from Zero. cv., and that is stated of the Wyntoun, Publication VIII. man. vi., to possess come the second sister out-of John Comyn, Earl away from Buchan, which discussed for Earl Malise the marriage settlement more than stated [old at the London area, April twenty-six, 1293 to have their daughter Matilda and you may Robert de- Tony, son out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de- Quincy E regarding Buchan We __________________I________________ We III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith We (als We Elizabeth regarding Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) We d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We I I I We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de- Keith E from = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony I ______I_______________________ I I I I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de Elizabeth out of Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 We ce Cheyne I We I = 2) Sir David We V We I de- Graham Sir William de I I__________ Keith I We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We I We III I We We I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke from Albany)